Peter Gojowczyk vs Jack Sock Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W W L L
Form
L L L W L L W L L LHead To Head: Gojowczyk 2 - 0 Sock
They have played 5 sets in total, with Gojowczyk winning 4 and Sock winning 1. The last match between Gojowczyk and Sock was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 07-10-2018, First, Hard with Peter Gojowczyk getting the victory 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peter Gojowczyk | 2 |
| Jack Sock | 0 |
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai(07-10-2018)
6
4
6
7
6
3
| Gojowczyk | Stats | Sock |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 854 | Ranking | 808 |
| 39 | Highest Rank | 8 |
| 35 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 10 |
| 55% (534-441) | Career Total W/L | 56% (322-248) |
| $1,837,855 | Career Prize Money | $4,932,130 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Sherif PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Jack Sock
57%
(
60 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
17
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Jack Sock
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 20 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:43:27 | Average Match Time | 1:43:27 |
| 58% (86/148) | 1st Serve % | 59% (102/172) |
| 85% (73/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (73/102) |
| 52% (32/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (27/70) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 42% (72/172) | Return Points Win % | 29% (43/148) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Sock Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jack Sock
62%
(
74 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Sock
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jack Sock
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Gregoire Barrere
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Jack Sock
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
10
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Ilya Ivashka
56%
(
75 of
133)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
9
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
3
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
38%
(
22 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
41%
(
55 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Jack Sock
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Jack Sock
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (534/441) | Win/Loss | 56% (322/248) |
| 53% (1219/1062) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (797/646) |
| 51% (11117/10493) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7296/6916) |
| 59% (208/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (149/133) |
| 47% (114/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (79/48) |
| 57% (182/135) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (66/48) |
| 49% (30/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.47 |
| 4258 | Aces Total | 3267 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 2229 | Total Double Faults | 2085 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:32:52 |
| 526.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.04 |
| 54% (24655/45516) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23259/39740) |
| 75% (18404/24655) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (17171/23259) |
| 49% (10183/20861) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8630/16476) |
| 40% (1667/4155) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1262/3212) |
| 38% (17058/45180) | Return Points Win % | 36% (14115/39678) |
| 53% (51/45) | Slam W/L | 55% (41/34) |
| 38% (15/25) | Masters W/L | 53% (59/53) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 51% (110/106) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (102/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 55% (212/173) | Challenger W/L | 59% (77/53) |
| 62% (145/90) | Futures W/L | 66% (31/16) |
| 56% (515/917) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (278/484) |
| 27% (11/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (36/74) |
| 50% (161/324) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (148/279) |
| 56% (160/288) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (104/205) |
| 85% (527/449) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (330/265) |
| 15% (527/77) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (330/63) |
| 19% (448/84) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (240/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
